Web IIS create website not setting app pool correctly, defaulting always to Asp.Net 2.0

Question

1.82K views11 - 12 - 2017Technical Support

0

Eric Newton 74 11 - 12 - 2017 0 Comments

Anytime a new website is created, its always selecting Asp.net 2.0 application pool. I have selected 4.0 and updated the app pool names to coincide correctly but it always ends up being Asp.net 2.0

9 Answers

score 0 · Answer 1 · 2017-12-11T19:43:13+00:00

Hello,

The application pool set is what is selected and configured in your Web Policy.

You can find the policy section in the bottom right of the serveradmin home page.

Regards,

Marco

score 0 · Answer 2 · 2017-12-11T22:05:03+00:00

Hi Marco, thanks for quick response. Here’s my server settings:

and when I create new website, theres no option for selecting an app pool, so a brand new site is created with Aspnet 2.0 app pool:

score 0 · Answer 3 · 2017-12-11T22:38:35+00:00

Your server settings aren’t the default settings set on new websites.

Server settings are there to configure the options that can be provided by the hosting plan.

In return those options become available in the Website Properties.

However the default settings applied to newly created websites are configured in the Policies section as described earlier.

Serveradmin home page –> Bottom right –> “Policies” –> Web Policy

score 0 · Answer 4 · 2017-12-11T22:39:40+00:00

Oh I see. I was missing that step when setting up the SolidCP installation.

Good to know!

Thanks man!

score 0 · Answer 5 · 2017-12-11T22:43:13+00:00

Np,

We still have loads of work to do documentation wise so i can understand the confusion 🙂

score 0 · Answer 6 · 2017-12-11T22:44:50+00:00

Without creating a new question, have you considered hosting the documentation on Github to support pull requests?

I would recommend it: An organization named “solidcp” and a repo named “docs”

ie, https://github.com/solidcp/docs/

score 0 · Answer 7 · 2017-12-11T22:47:32+00:00

unfortunatly that user and organization is not in our control.

we contacted github due to copyright/ tm violations but they simply said theres nothing they can do as per there policies.

so we are not on github, instead we run it over our own gitlab server.

score 0 · Answer 8 · 2017-12-11T22:50:10+00:00

That’s unfortunate. Probably could get a bit more traction with more people complaining. I will certainly complain about it to github.

I’m signed into the gitlab instance which is cool. Just thinking about having the large userbase of github people available to make the doc process as easy as possible… lol.

Have you considered a slight variation to org name, like Real_SolidCP or something?

score 0 · Answer 9 · 2017-12-11T22:58:57+00:00

mhm.
the user base aswell as easier to view/ help the project is a benefit of github.
i was actually surprised they refuse to help with this issue since msg’s in our name has been made, aswell as distributed our source at some point.

due to that i also didnt quite consider to take an alternative name, as personally it will just be confusing for people, not to mention the attitude of github allowing to impersonate projects/ organizations is quite off putting.

Web IIS create website not setting app pool correctly, defaulting always to Asp.Net 2.0

9 Answers

Attachments

Search questions

Question stats

Other Questions