One of the biggest problems that I saw with DNP and WSP still seems to persist in this version; that is the fact that the server site runs as an administrative user. This allows a compromised site running ASP or .net to be able to extract the credentials for this account from the MetaBase.
To make matters worse, if the server si on a domain then they can use tools like Mimikatz to capture domain level credentials and spread filth across your entire windows domain. I would really like to see the sites use non-admin credentials and then talk to a backend service that has the admin access. This would greatly reduce the risk associated with using this product.
Additionally, this product should handle filesystem permissions like Plesk does; that is lockdown filesystem access for the SCP_IUSRS group so that the group has no access to anything they do not need, and there should be a system in place where you can tell SCP what custom permissions it should set for this group on third party objects that SCP doesn’t just know about.
The lack of these two things is preventing us from deploying this product.
Running it as administrator user can be done in 2 ways (atleast for domain based systems)
- You can assign it administrator member groups in the application pool (i’m assuming this is what you do not want)
- You can fill in administrator account in the Active Directory Settings section when you set it to “secure”
However it does need higher system level access in order to create the resources for you. so one way or another the SolidCP Server module requires administrator level access.
It also only needs this for the SolidCP Server module, no other website needs (or gets) this kind of access. so when a site is breached they should never be able to climb up the ladder and find out your administrator access (assuming the server is hardened properly).
To your second point:
WebsitePanel more or less assumed that the system administrator locks down their own system (so removing users group from c, adding deny rights to system32 folders, etc)
however Marc has been working hard on automating the deployment, configuration, and hardening for you with his configuration script available here:
This will automate most of the hardening aspects at this point (it does not yet do SSL optimization though).
My point is that a website should never run with admin credentials, especially not domain admin. On a shared hosting server there is always a way for an attacker to gain access to information in the metabase. In fact, prove it to yourself, set up a server with SCP, lock it down as you say you should, put a site on it, put a copy of aspxspy on one of the sites, then have fun reading registry information and metabase properties. If you haven’t seen this happen then you either don’t run production shared hosting servers, have been very lucky, or just aren’t checking out what is happening on your servers. This isn’t the only tool out there, one the worst is mimikatz, it doesn’t even have to be downloaded, it can just be loaded into memory and executed.
Well to keep it simple:
SolidCP Server (and anything that needs to create system resources) needs to have administrative access one way or another, SolidCP, Plesk, and other panels are not an exception to this. without one form of administrative access (if it’s login codes so login as admin then execute by powershell, if it’s the app pool it self to allow you to access the system resources, etc.. that ofcourse is entirely up to the program where SolidCP supports both).
In the very end, a user with no access to the C disk –> Can’t make a folder on the C disk, or apply permissions for the new site user, create a new Site user, or create an IIS Website on the system. this is just OS basics that everyone has to comply to.
I have multiple live web servers, with 4000+ sites (all actively used) and running for over 5 + years, servers are heavily monitored and well looked after, we have not had any system level intrusion, sites like WordPress / joomla / dnp ofcourse do get hacked, but with our setup that can’t walk further then their own site. (which if spreads malicious content will be suspended etc.)
I do wonder if there’s some confusion about which sites you think have administrative access?
As for SolidCP it’s only the SolidCP Server (which you usually lock down to specific ip’s only).
any other website it creates (customer websites) have minimal access just to their own directory, with their own site user etc.
I tried to load your example. after allowing it in our exceptions list (as by default my system removes it instantly due to threat) –> the only thing you can actually get with it is system processes. (with limits)
here’s some screenshots:
As you can see: Access is denied as any decently configured Windows Web server should give.
It can’t read any IIS site / app pool / user, as a site has no such access to it.
for CMD it’s ofcourse denied too:
In the end, none of my customer sites have any such rights, The SolidCP Server is locked behind firewalls, and only allowed by specific internal ip’s. (so no chance this kind of tool ends up on the SolidCP Server site that can actually preform these actions).
I understand fully that the CP needs admin access, I am just saying that the SITE shouldn’t have admin credentials. Also, you should try that IISSpy option on a site that is running with .net full trust. Which unfortunately we have to allow in some of the environments we manage because our clients demand that their clients be able to do so.
We don’t have that option. That is my point, not every server can be as secure as you would like it because of client requirements, which is why the CP should be as secure as possible. Pinning administrative credentials on an IIS site is insecure and very bad practice, it should never be done. I know you don’t want to hear this, but it is the very real truth. Please consider delegating the tasks to a service that has admin access and having the server site run as a non-privileged user.
Well as i said, you can also configure it with “secure” mode and enter a admin level user / pass credentials in the database, that way your application pool user has no administrative rights and it uses the login on cmd / powershell.
though personally thats less secure (as mssql database hanging infront of a public portal –> more easy to grab your details then trying to hack a site that no1 besides portal/local ip can load, with it’s application pool username + password while hacking from another site (that has no rights but it’s own folder at all asp.net full trust will still not get you inside the SolidCP Server files if you secured it properly.
but besides that point, everyone can lock down the SolidCP Server module –> even with Windows Firewall and bindings, only the Portal needs access to it (which runs on normal privs)
In the end the basics stay the same as any other panel. we really can’t get around that.
And as i also shown you: the setups are not vulnerable for the tools you mentioned, no server is that is properly setup.
I am really done arguing with you. You are obviously not concerned with making a secure control panel. You would rather everyone else secure everything around your CP.
>In the end the basics stay the same as any other panel. we really can’t get around that.
This is completely incorrect. Maybe take the time to actually learn about how some of your competition works?
>everyone can lock down the SolidCP Server module –> even with Windows Firewall and bindings, only the Portal needs access to it (which runs on normal privs)
Other sites running on the same server bypass the firewall…..
>And as i also shown you: the setups are not vulnerable for the tools you mentioned, no server is that is properly setup.
You haven’t shown me anything, other than the fact that you couldn’t use certain portions of one tool in the context of a fully locked down site. When you are managing the hosts of other companies that have looser security requirements so that they can support and therefore attract a wider range of clients; you have situations where these tools can be leveraged. You can secure against them as much as you can without breaking functionality of their site; however there is some things in these situations that you cannot protect against, and having a site running with admin credentials presents a major security vulnerability in these situations.
All I am saying is that you guys should really spend some time making a backend service, not a website that does the job of the server component. It’s fine if you don’t want to, just say “we don’t want to do that”. Don’t tell me it isn’t necessary, because you are simply not correct.
SolidCP is a secure panel, about as good as it gets by having 3 individual modules to separate the process, which literally gives you 1 front end, 1 sql end, 1 server backend.
The example i showed you is on an normal web server (the way any server should be setup including with plesk) with normal deployed site through SolidCP.
You get the exact same results if you run the deployment tool Marc made for the community. (which automates normal web server deployments for you).
In the end if you don’t like the way SolidCP works / is constructed thats fine, again your entitled to your opinion, but to state it’s not secure that is incorrect.
We have been deploying WebsitePanel and now SolidCP for many large companies for over 5 years, none of them have any history of a hacked server. (not even one)
No tool (including the ones you mentioned) ever managed to get outside their own site dir, or execute anything on the system, no infection we seen ever passing outside someones website directory.
Personally i can’t really think of many ways to make things more safe, and so far i saw nothing that indicates a security issue.
Just saying the way things are done isn’t correct doesn’t change the history, the tested tools, and even tested security by multiple 3rd parties for certification and assurance so far all passed.
If you want me to change my thought: Come with clear evidence to show it’s not secure, until then, there’s little more that i can do, change or add to this discussion.
Also, do you happen to run Coldfusion on any of these super secure windows servers that have never been compromised?
- Views4451 times
- Answers9 answers