Just wanted SM to work .. we now thinking of doing own ground up then we are in control with it not have wait or waste our time some to look at some else work project
All the very best
@macintoshelectronics I understand, however when you build it from the ground up you still face the same issues: requiring some dev who's able to make it, retain that dev.. or if you can't later on seek different developer to "fix" what someone else made.
It's the pitfall of your own development which we seen plenty in our "normal" job as support engineers.
A community should help to fall back on, however in this case i think (correct me if i am wrong) there was alot of input but no real "control" to guide it all into a singular point (fix). (i saw it more or less go in a ton of different directions where for us at SCP we really lost track on the information to help out).
What i saw was alot of talk no real action
Many people lost interest in this project investment any time to it
I was ready to make investments in to this software
I this if I was using your software something broke
I would 100s my customer live me total stuck with broke kit of software
@macintoshelectronics I agree on that.
We are on page 11 on this topic, yet if you check github: do you see any SM bug logged related to this forum topic? (there is none).
Action comes from both sides in a community, I personally don't run SM, i didn't see any issue, therefor nothing to fix unless there's a clear report on what to fix by a community member with the actual issue.
To say people lost interest in this project: i disagree, we have several community members, partners, etc stepping up while i was personally indisposed of time for almost 2 years, which made me proud to resume working on the project now, making the new releases and roadmaps and so on.
That the community shrunk a little during that absense i can understand too, not just due to the project but also due to the shift in IT it self.
So did see post by others about sm not working
1st come to know had long issue at github
Getting on now i bid you very good day i think you get my point solidcp know work on it
Hope one day you get SM working ill look at it again ping messages once you have
@macintoshelectronics Your refering something without providing the actual information.
Anyways i have:
- installed SmarterMail Free 100.0.9088.25586 (Nov 18, 2024)
- Used the SolidCP SmarterMail 100.x + provider.
and afterwards created an account with no issues or errors (see screenshots of scp and sm).
Please provide us with some actual information of what is not working (steps to reproduce).
So far all i can conclude (even with my own quick tests) is that it's working.
Hi Marco,
I haven't tried with the latest versions of SmarterMail, but SolidCP didn't work with the SmarterMail version until May of this year; I tried it with both providers. Tomorrow I will test the functionality again with the latest version of SmarterMail.
I appreciate the effort you put into keeping SolidCP alive.
As the PAID Sponsor of the SM100 Provider, we stopped using it because it simply was not ready for production. I had a ticket open with Trevor but communications stalled and he stopped working on it. We have been "getting by" with the SM10 Provider.
One IMPORTANT thing you guys have to remember in the servers settings is the SmarterMail Web Services URL is different for each Provider.
SM10: https://mail.yourserver.com/services/
SM100: https://mail.yourserver.com
We have tested Plesk and Hosting Controller and those panels are missing key features that we use in SCP. Therefore, we are sticking with SCP.
Marco, very good to hear that the project is coming back from the dead. I will post each bug in individual posts so that I can include all images related to that bug.
